Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicifons:Scriptorium" differant

Content deleted Content added
Linea 526:
Also, There appears to be an interpunctus from time to time. It is not a scanning artifact since there are pages where the line starts with the interpunctus and the alignment of the line is shifted because of it. This was not transcribed when Barbaking did page 70, but you can see one in the image, in verse 17, the middle of the third line. For these I also did not spot an explanation in the front matter. --[[Usor:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:EncycloPetey|disputatio]]) 14:59, 20 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
:{{Ping|EncycloPetey}} I do not understand as well, but I'm in no way an expert on this matter... I didn't even notice the interpunctus; and I wondered as well about the parenthesis (the (3, 5) near the bottom of the page is even more obscure, since it is completely out of numeration with everything else...) Maybe we could ask Wikipedia's [[:w:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible|WikiProject Bible]] if we really want to find this out... --[[Usor:Barbaking|Barbaking]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Barbaking|disputatio]]) 15:18, 20 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
:: This isn't a general Bible issue, but seems to be specific to the Codex Amiatinus, and perhaps specific to this 1854 edition. There is extensive front matter by the editor, and the answer might be present there. I did not spot an explanation on a once-through look, but my Latin may not be up to the task and the explanation might be only a few words. --[[Usor:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:EncycloPetey|disputatio]]) 15:23, 20 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
 
== Proposed restyling to [[Formula:Titulus]] ==