Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicifons:Scriptorium" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 518:
I will need help getting the transcription started because I am unfamiliar with the Formula names on Vicifons. I am used to working on the English Wikisource. --[[Usor:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:EncycloPetey|disputatio]]) 22:11, 19 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
:{{Ping|EncycloPetey}} first, thank you for your work and for every contribute you will want to give to this project. I started by adding some chapter subdivision to the [[Liber:Codex Amiatinus novum testamentum latine (1854).djvu|index]]; the question is if we want to split each Gospel by chapter (Like Mattheus - I, Mattheus - II and so on). It would be probably better to do so, but it will take some time to be done :) Is there anything else in particular you need? --[[Usor:Barbaking|Barbaking]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Barbaking|disputatio]]) 13:21, 20 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
::
:Ps {{Ping|EncycloPetey}} I also transcribed [[Pagina:Codex Amiatinus novum testamentum latine (1854).djvu/70|page 70]], see if you can find some hints there... I used {{Tl|VBibliae}} for the verses' numbers --[[Usor:Barbaking|Barbaking]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Barbaking|disputatio]]) 14:31, 20 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
:: Thank you for that. I did not know which template to use for verse numbers. --[[Usor:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:EncycloPetey|disputatio]]) 14:59, 20 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
However, I still have questions about two things that I see in the text: (1) What are the parenthetical number pairs which appear in the text. For example, on [[Pagina:Codex Amiatinus novum testamentum latine (1854).djvu/70|page 70]] verse 1 has a (1, 3.) as well. I could not find an explanation of this notation, though perhaps I simply missed it when I scanned through the front matter of the volume.
Also, There appears to be an interpunctus from time to time. It is not a scanning artifact since there are pages where the line starts with the interpunctus and the alignment of the line is shifted because of it. This was not transcribed when Barbaking did page 70, but you can see one in the image, in verse 17, the middle of the third line. For these I also did not spot an explanation in the front matter. --[[Usor:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:EncycloPetey|disputatio]]) 14:59, 20 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
== Proposed restyling to [[Formula:Titulus]] ==
| |||